(Note: unfortunately, I was unable to upload any photos to the blog post, not sure why it wouldn't work.)
Follow the link for photos: https://www.facebook.com/inkpotarts
(May 2025)
I received an invitation from the director. I know Jo-anne well
enough that I would attend anything she put on, regardless of its
subject. I also love this theatre (The Living Arts Centre) so much
that I would leap at any opportunity to enter that building, even if
there were nothing onstage.
I walk in blind, totally ignorant of the play's subject, history,
style or themes, and though the opening scenes present a chanting
chorus that seems to forewarn of struggle and tragedy, I quiet my
expectations and open myself to the drama.
I open myself so that whatever the story wants me to feel,
I want
to feel that.
A murder, a woman in flight with a baby, an escape.
Oh, this is a hero origin story, I think, and find comfort in
that assumption.
Silly me.
But I don't want to tell you the story, I'm not equipped for that,
I'm still dizzy with the spectacle I have only this night witnessed
and I could not string the events together. But I can tell you what
I felt.
Being inside that theatre,
that magically sculpted room that makes every sound into music,
being there with those robed women speaking with Godly voices
that command the limits and mysteries of the universe,
being inside that
sound, inside that timeless rhythmic chanting of the Chorus
I am a child again, I accept the magic of the world inside
the dome of the Chorus' song.
And so, with startling alacrity, I let myself be swept into the
quest, not asking questions, but rather accepting my part as witness.
Bliss. Seated close to the orchestra, I glimpse the musicians faces
by lamplight, watch their fingers caress sweet songs from strings and
wood, and I am seated inside this music, inside the Chorus, inside
the theatre...
A man lies dead, his wife cradles him, weeping. The hero asks my
question for me...
What's happening?
and the grieving woman's reply pulls
unbidden tears from my eyes.
The world happened, all at once
As if by force, I sit back in my
seat and blink through my blurring vision.
I let it happen to me. Her grief. I let the dramatic force of her
cries break through, and I think,
oh, this play is much more than a hero tale.
This is a light inside
the dark poetry of the
world. This is hope inside
utter desperate grief.
This is a dream inside the
music, inside the
Chorus, inside the
theatre, and we are allowed for these precious hours to exist inside
all this with the
dreamers and makers of this magnificent interpretation of an ancient
classic drama, told and re-told. A ship of Theseus sort of play,
re-made for our own age, for our own country. We, the audience, are
part of a history now, the story of a story, inside
the music, inside
the chorus, inside
the theatre, inside
the world.
This is not just a hero story. We
moderns have gotten used to a certain format of hero tales, dominated
this century by American legends. Parsifal is a hero who quests not
to defeat an Evil, but to discover the Good. His only real nemesis
is himself.
----------
(Writing now the morning after the play)
So now, to speak technically for a moment:
I've read a few ancient Greek plays and understand the reason those
plays are still in print, still being performed. Those plays are not
ancient, they are contemporary with every moment of human history. I
feel that way about a lot of ancient literature. Parsifal seems the
same. An ancient tale, continually re-told because it feels
continually relevant. I mention the Greek plays because of their
famous use of the Chorus, the voice of the world who, like us in the
audience, are both witnesses and participants in the story.
The use of this ancient dramatic method does something to me: It
lets me know that this presentation is not a mirror of reality, it is
a dramatic presentation. In order to really participate
properly, and by that I mean - to watch the play with the best frame
of mind - I have to enter the dramatic mindset, I must suspend my
disbelief and silence my critical mind. I have to cease all
assumptions, cease predicting the outcome, cease testing the
characters by my own ideals. I have to let them tell their story in
the way they tell it, and I must receive it as true in that moment.
Myths aren't lies. No-one who reads them is expected to interpret
their events in the same way we must read the daily news. Yet
neither are myths True, not in the scientific sense. Myths are
emotionally true, emotionally real. They describe a world that is
both utterly familiar and magically foreign and if we are to best
absorb the benefit of their wisdom, we must let them speak to us in
their own language. For the stage this is a visual language of
costume and choreographed movements, a sonic language of harmonies
and dissonances, a transformation of written text into living
representation.
The dramatic Chorus, robed, masked, mysterious, chanting in unison,
speaking seemingly from the stage and the wings and the darkness of
the ceiling above me, surround me with the magic of their word - the
Chorus are the gateway into Myth.
When they speak, I exist inside their truth, I am held inside
the limits of their knowledge and I can relax.
While I am here, inside
the theatre, the outside
world
does not exist. The Chorus gives me permission to allow the myth to
be true, to allow the actors' actions and words and movements to be
natural expressions of their own reality. This is dramatic
reality. I have experienced this continually in dance, and it is
what I love about the stage. Taken away from the context of the
theatre, those behaviours and movements resemble madness. If a
dancer performed her routine in the supermarket, sans music, most
people would turn away, aware only of their discomfort at the
conventions of civil behaviour being ignored so openly.
But on the stage, accompanied by music, those same movement are the
pinnacle of beauteous truth.
Inside
the dome of the Chorus' magic spell, the magical characters are real.
This
particular play also used another very successful method for helping
me to discard my assumptions: assumptions about the play as a whole,
as well as what I might presume about the behaviours and actions of
the individual characters. Parsifal is a European legend, an
Arthurian legend, and those titles carry a whole raft of cultural
assumptions. So when the play opened with an Australian Aboriginal
dancer with twin boomerangs click-clacking the rhythm of his
movement, again I was kicked out of the realm of my assumptions about
how a medieval European play can behave. The continued use of this
dance and of aboriginal artwork in backdrop motifs maintained this
barrier against forming assumptions. So, in the wonderful confusion
this juxtaposition created,
I
relaxed back into the comfort of assuming nothing, and of letting the
mythological reality this production wanted me to believe, to be
real.
This was not Parsifal set in a familiar European world. This was a
new myth, and to return to my Greek comparisons, a ship of Theseus,
built of familiar seeming parts making a familiar shaped craft, but
the completed vessel is in truth, a completely new ship in which we
the audience are swept away on the tides of history being made in the
present.
This
present, our present, does not have the ancient borders of medieval
Europe; cultural, geographic, ethnic. So when several Indian, and
Australian aboriginal actors appeared, knights in armour wielding
long swords, Queens in their throne rooms, speaking with unmasked
Indian or Australian accents, again I was forced out of my
assumptions about the characters they portrayed. This was not a
medieval play for a medieval audience. This was a modern play for a
modern, Australian audience. I sat very still and allowed the story
to be told to me, I allowed it to be true, to be real. I stopped
trying to guess what might happen next, I stopped trying to be clever
and outwit the story in my mind.
This kind of modernisation and cultural updating succeeds or fails in
dramatic re-tellings for reasons perhaps too subtle for me to
describe. At its worst it can feel forced, shoe-horning modern
references into an ancient frame in way that makes both setting and
characterisation feel false. At its best, (and I consider this
production of Parsifal to be a beautiful example of this), it
delivers a completely honest, sincere, faithful re-imagining of an
already imaginary world. The actors in Parsifal were so invested,
their performances so powerful, their delivery so believable,
emotional, articulate and passionate that I could do nought but stare
in awe at their embodiment of archetypes whose familiarity reinforce
in me the belief in the universality of human experience.
So
that's what I've been digging down to. The universality of this
production lifts it out of its medieval native soil, and sets it
running free in a new world, for a new audience. Yet, universal as
it's themes and narratives are, I'm fully aware of how successfully
the script has been adapted for a specifically Australian audience.
It spoke to me with a familiar vernacular, but it did so in such a
way that I was continually surprised and not for a moment could I
rely upon pre-conceived notions to make judgements.
I
spent an evening sat inside
this
magical world and I stepped out of it at the end of the show a
changed person. To be in
the
audience for such a production is to have participated in the long
history of the story of Arthur and Parsifal. That history is now a
part of my story, I am a part of that history. We are a part of that
story. Participants in something much bigger than ourselves,
something universal and personal and timeless and magical and real.